ACT for OCD is emerging as one of the most promising evidence-based approaches for obsessive-compulsive disorder, particularly when combined with Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP). Obsessive-compulsive disorder affects approximately 1.2% of U.S. adults in any given year and 2.3% across a lifetime, making it one of the more common—and most misunderstood—anxiety-related conditions [NIMH, 2023]. For decades, the gold-standard psychological treatment has been Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP), a specialized form of cognitive-behavioral therapy in which people deliberately face feared thoughts, images, or situations while resisting the compulsions that usually follow. ERP works. Meta-analytic reviews consistently show large effect sizes and durable symptom reductions [Öst et al., 2015]. Yet ERP is also famously difficult: dropout rates hover between 14% and 30%, and many patients decline to start it at all [Ong et al., 2016].
This is where Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) enters the picture—not as a replacement for ERP, but as a powerful complement. By adding cognitive defusion, acceptance, and values-based motivation to exposure work, ACT can make ERP more tolerable, more meaningful, and, for some patients, more effective. This article explains how ACT and ERP integrate for OCD, what the research actually shows, and how clinicians and clients can practically weave these approaches together.
Key Takeaways
- ACT for OCD complements—doesn't replace—ERP, adding defusion, acceptance, and values-based motivation to reduce dropout and increase engagement.
- Cognitive defusion teaches clients to see intrusive thoughts as mental events rather than truths, loosening the fusion that drives compulsions.
- Values clarification reframes exposures from symptom-reduction endurance tests into meaningful actions aligned with what matters most.
- Research shows ACT-enhanced ERP improves acceptability, reduces attrition, and produces outcomes comparable to or better than ERP alone [Twohig et al., 2018].
- Purely obsessional and scrupulosity subtypes often respond especially well to ACT's emphasis on defusion and acceptance of internal experience.
- Integration typically spans 12–20 sessions, moving through creative hopelessness, values, defusion, values-based exposure, and committed action.
Understanding OCD: More Than Cleanliness and Checking
OCD is a chronic anxiety-related disorder marked by intrusive obsessions and repetitive compulsions that consume time and impair functioning. It goes far beyond stereotypes of handwashing and symmetry, encompassing themes like harm, taboo thoughts, relationship doubt, and "just right" sensations.
OCD is characterized by two interlocking features: obsessions (unwanted, intrusive thoughts, images, or urges that provoke distress) and compulsions (repetitive behaviors or mental acts performed to reduce that distress or prevent a feared outcome) [American Psychiatric Association, 2022]. Despite popular stereotypes about handwashing and symmetry, OCD includes a wide range of themes: contamination, harm, sexual or religious taboos, relationship doubt, health concerns, and "just right" sensations, to name a few.
The World Health Organization has long identified OCD among the top causes of illness-related disability worldwide, particularly because of its early onset—typically in adolescence or young adulthood—and its tendency to become chronic without treatment [WHO, 2022]. NAMI notes that the average time between symptom onset and effective treatment is 14 to 17 years, largely due to shame, misdiagnosis, and lack of access to trained clinicians [NAMI, 2023].
Why Doesn't the Content of Obsessions Matter as Much as You'd Think?
One of the most liberating insights from modern OCD research is that intrusive thoughts themselves are universal. Studies have repeatedly shown that roughly 90% of the general population experiences unwanted intrusive thoughts—including violent, sexual, or blasphemous ones—that are indistinguishable in content from clinical obsessions [Radomsky et al., 2014]. What differs in OCD is not the presence of these thoughts but the person's relationship to them: the fusion, the meaning-making, the desperate attempts to neutralize them.
This distinction is exactly where ACT shines. ACT targets the relationship with inner experience rather than the content of experience itself.
Exposure and Response Prevention: The Established Foundation
ERP is the most empirically supported psychotherapy for OCD, involving deliberate exposure to feared stimuli paired with prevention of compulsive responses. It rests on both classical habituation and, more recently, inhibitory learning principles that emphasize new learning over fear reduction.
ERP, developed by Edna Foa and colleagues, remains the most empirically supported psychotherapy for OCD [International OCD Foundation, 2023]. It rests on two clinical pillars:
- Exposure: Systematic, prolonged, and repeated contact with feared stimuli—whether external (a doorknob, a knife, a religious image) or internal (a thought, sensation, or memory).
- Response prevention: Refraining from the compulsive behaviors—overt or mental—that normally follow the trigger.
Traditional ERP was originally grounded in habituation theory: the idea that anxiety naturally decreases with sustained exposure. More recent research has shifted toward inhibitory learning theory, which emphasizes that the goal of exposure is not necessarily to reduce fear in the moment but to learn new associations—for example, that a feared outcome does not occur, or that anxiety can be tolerated without acting on it [Craske et al., 2014]. This shift dovetails elegantly with ACT, which similarly deprioritizes symptom reduction in favor of new, more flexible behavior in the presence of difficult experience.
What Are the Limits of Pure ERP?
Despite its efficacy, ERP is not a universal fit. Common obstacles include:
- Refusal or dropout: Up to 25–30% of patients decline ERP or leave treatment prematurely [Ong et al., 2016].
- Purely obsessional or scrupulosity subtypes: When compulsions are mental (rumination, silent prayer, mental review), it can be difficult to design external exposures.
- Low motivation: Patients often understand ERP intellectually but cannot sustain the willingness required to do it.
- Comorbid conditions: Depression, trauma, and shame can undermine engagement.
ACT provides tools that directly address these obstacles.
What Does ACT Bring to the Table?
ACT is an evidence-based therapy that aims to increase psychological flexibility—the ability to stay present, open, and moving toward valued action even in the presence of difficult thoughts and feelings. For OCD, its six core processes translate directly into new ways to relate to obsessions and dismantle compulsions.
ACT, developed by Steven C. Hayes and colleagues in the 1980s and refined over decades, aims to increase psychological flexibility—the ability to stay present, open to experience, and moving in valued directions even when internal experiences are painful [Hayes et al., 2012]. Its six core processes—acceptance, cognitive defusion, present-moment awareness, self-as-context, values, and committed action—map remarkably well onto the psychological challenges of OCD.
A landmark randomized controlled trial by Twohig and colleagues found that ACT produced clinically significant reductions in OCD symptoms comparable to progressive relaxation, with strong effects maintained at three-month follow-up [Twohig et al., 2010]. A subsequent trial comparing ACT plus ERP to ERP alone showed that adding ACT enhanced treatment acceptability and reduced attrition without sacrificing efficacy [Twohig et al., 2018]. A 2020 meta-analysis concluded that ACT is a promising evidence-based option for OCD, particularly for patients who struggle with pure ERP [Bluett et al., 2014; updated in Twohig & Levin, 2020].
Cognitive Defusion: Loosening the Grip of Obsessions
Cognitive defusion is the ACT skill of stepping back from thoughts and seeing them as mental events rather than literal truths or commands. In OCD, this weakens the fusion that turns intrusive thoughts into apparent evidence, warnings, or moral verdicts.
In OCD, fusion is often the engine of suffering: an intrusive thought like "What if I harmed my child?" is treated not as a random mental event but as evidence, warning, or moral failure.
What Are Common Defusion Techniques for OCD?
- Labeling: "I'm having the thought that I might be contaminated," instead of "I might be contaminated." This subtle shift creates observational distance.
- Naming the story: Clients name their recurring obsessional pattern ("Here's the harm story again," "That's the checking story"), which reduces its authority.
- Word repetition (Titchener's exercise): Repeating a feared word aloud—"knife, knife, knife"—for 30 seconds until it becomes just sound, weakening its emotional charge.
- Thanking the mind: Responding to an intrusive thought with a mental "Thanks, mind," acknowledging without engaging.
- Physicalizing: Imagining the thought as an object with a color, shape, and texture, then placing it on an imagined shelf.
Crucially, defusion is not a compulsion. Compulsions aim to eliminate distress or neutralize a feared thought. Defusion aims to change the relationship with the thought while allowing it to remain. When used correctly, defusion supports exposure by helping clients stay in contact with feared material longer, without escaping into rituals.
Acceptance: Making Room for Discomfort
Acceptance in ACT means willingness to have thoughts, feelings, and sensations as they are, in the service of what matters—not resignation or gritted-teeth tolerance. For OCD, it directly counters the experiential avoidance that fuels compulsive rituals.
The core paradox of OCD is that trying not to have the thought, feeling, or sensation makes it stronger. This is consistent with decades of research on thought suppression, which shows that deliberate attempts to push away unwanted thoughts often produce rebound effects [Wegner, 1994]. Compulsions are, in essence, sophisticated forms of experiential avoidance.
Acceptance in ACT is not resignation, tolerance through gritted teeth, or liking painful experiences. It is a willingness to have thoughts, feelings, and sensations as they are, without struggle, in the service of what matters. For OCD clients, acceptance means:
- Making room for the surge of anxiety without ritualizing.
- Allowing uncertainty—perhaps the central task in OCD treatment—to exist without demanding resolution.
- Welcoming the intrusive thought as a natural product of a busy human mind.
Willingness scales are useful clinical tools here. Asking "On a scale from 0 to 10, how willing are you right now to have this anxiety in the service of your values?" reframes exposure from an endurance test into a values-driven act. This aligns closely with inhibitory learning models, which emphasize that consolidating new learning depends on genuine engagement with the feared experience [Craske et al., 2014].
Values-Based Exposure: The Motivational Engine
Values-based exposure links every ERP task to what the client cares about most, transforming exposures from symptom-reduction drills into acts of meaningful living. This intrinsic motivation sustains engagement long after the novelty of therapy wears off.
In traditional ERP, the motivation for facing fear is symptom reduction: "If I do this, my anxiety will decrease." ACT reframes this. The motivation becomes: What kind of life do I want to live, and what is OCD stealing from me?
Values clarification early in treatment—often using tools like the Valued Living Questionnaire (VLQ) or the Bull's Eye Values worksheet—makes exposure meaningful [Wilson et al., 2010]. Consider a mother whose harm obsessions have caused her to avoid bathing her infant. Framed traditionally, exposure is "holding a baby near water while feeling anxious." Framed through ACT, it becomes "showing up as the kind of loving, present mother I want to be, even when my mind serves me terrifying images."
Research suggests that values-integrated exposures produce higher engagement and better long-term maintenance of gains, likely because values provide intrinsic motivation that outlasts the temporary discomfort of any single exposure [Gloster et al., 2020].
How Do You Build a Values-Based Exposure Hierarchy?
- Identify life domains OCD has narrowed: parenting, intimacy, work, spirituality, community, health.
- Clarify a value in each domain: "I value being emotionally available to my partner."
- Identify OCD-driven avoidances: "I avoid physical closeness because of relationship OCD doubts."
- Design values-linked exposures: Initiate physical affection with partner without seeking reassurance, while allowing doubt to remain.
- Rate willingness, not distress: Track how willing you were rather than how anxious you became.
Self-as-Context: You Are the Sky, Not the Weather
Self-as-context is the ACT process of recognizing yourself as the continuous awareness in which thoughts, feelings, and sensations arise—rather than as any of those experiences themselves. For OCD sufferers terrified that a horrific thought reveals a horrific self, this shift is profoundly liberating.
Metaphors help: You are the sky; obsessions are weather passing through. You are the chessboard, not the pieces battling on it. Clients begin to notice that no matter what content the mind produces, there is always someone here noticing it—and that someone is not the content.
Integrating ACT and ERP: A Practical Framework
Integrated ACT-enhanced ERP typically unfolds over 12 to 20 sessions, moving from creative hopelessness and values clarification to skill-building, values-based exposures, and committed action. This arc keeps ERP rigorous while embedding it in a meaningful therapeutic frame.
What Happens in Sessions 1–2: Assessment and Creative Hopelessness?
Clinicians map the client's OCD themes, compulsions (overt and mental), triggers, and avoided situations. Rather than jumping straight into psychoeducation about anxiety, ACT begins with creative hopelessness: gently exploring what the client has tried to control OCD, at what cost, and whether those strategies have worked long-term. This paradoxically opens motivation to try something radically different.
Sessions 3–4: Values Clarification
Clients identify what matters most in life and articulate how OCD has narrowed those domains. This becomes the compass for the rest of treatment.
Sessions 5–6: Defusion and Acceptance Skills
Before exposures begin in earnest, clients build a repertoire of defusion and acceptance skills using neutral or moderately distressing material. This is akin to learning to swim in shallow water before entering the deep end.
Sessions 7–15: Values-Based Exposure and Response Prevention
Exposures are conducted in ascending difficulty, each linked explicitly to a value. Response prevention includes both external rituals (checking, washing) and internal ones (mental review, reassurance-seeking, thought suppression). Defusion and acceptance are used during exposures rather than to escape them.
Sessions 16–20: Committed Action and Relapse Prevention
Treatment concludes with generalization: identifying committed actions across life domains, planning for future flare-ups, and framing setbacks as normal opportunities to practice flexibility rather than failures.
Special Applications of ACT for OCD
ACT-enhanced ERP is flexible enough to be adapted for subtypes and populations that often struggle with traditional protocols, including purely obsessional OCD, scrupulosity, pediatric presentations, and medication-combined care.
Pure O and Scrupulosity
Purely obsessional OCD—where compulsions are largely mental—has historically been difficult to treat with ERP alone. ACT's emphasis on defusion and acceptance is particularly well-suited here. When the intrusive thought is the trigger and the compulsion is silent rumination, teaching clients to notice, name, and allow the thought without engaging can be transformative. A study by Twohig, Hayes, and colleagues found ACT effective for scrupulosity, a religious/moral OCD subtype where traditional exposures can feel spiritually or ethically fraught [Twohig et al., 2015].
Pediatric OCD
The Child Mind Institute notes that OCD affects roughly 1 in 200 children and adolescents [Child Mind Institute, 2023]. ACT-informed ERP for youth uses concrete metaphors ("OCD is like a bully"), playful defusion ("sing your worry in an opera voice"), and family-based values work. Studies suggest developmentally adapted ACT is feasible and effective for adolescents with OCD [Armstrong et al., 2013].
Medication and ACT-ERP
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), often at higher doses than for depression, remain first-line pharmacotherapy for OCD according to the American Psychiatric Association [APA, 2023]. Combining SSRIs with ERP produces additive benefits for many patients, and ACT can be integrated with either or both. ACT specifically may help clients hold uncertainty about whether medication is "working" without ritualizing around it.
Common Pitfalls When Combining ACT and ERP
The most frequent mistakes involve using ACT skills as covert compulsions or diluting the rigor of response prevention. Vigilance about these traps keeps the integration honest and effective.
- Using defusion as avoidance: If a client uses "I'm just having a thought" to dismiss the exposure and reduce contact with feared material, defusion has become a subtle compulsion. Skilled clinicians watch for this.
- Values as reassurance: "I'm doing this because I value being a good parent" can slide into reassurance-seeking if it becomes a mantra to escape anxiety. Values should motivate approach, not neutralize distress.
- Skipping response prevention: ACT without genuine response prevention is not ACT for OCD—it's mindfulness training. Exposure and rigorous response prevention remain essential.
- Rushing acceptance: Telling a client to "just accept" intrusive thoughts without first building creative hopelessness, values, and defusion skills often fails.
Self-Help Practices Between Sessions
Structured daily habits can reinforce ACT-enhanced OCD recovery between therapy sessions, sustaining momentum and building the psychological flexibility muscles that make ERP work.
- Notice-and-name practice: Twice daily, notice an intrusive thought and label it: "I'm having the thought that…" Track how often you can catch fusion in real time.
- Values check-in: Each morning, identify one small values-based action you can take, especially in a domain OCD has narrowed.
- Willingness dialing: Before facing a trigger, rate 0–10 how willing you are to have the anxiety. Aim to increase willingness, not decrease distress.
- Mindful breathing anchored in the body: Not to suppress thoughts, but to practice observing them arise and pass.
- Track compulsions, not obsessions: Journaling obsessions can become another form of engagement. Instead, track what compulsions (overt and mental) you resisted and what values-based actions you took.
When to Seek Professional Help
OCD is highly treatable, but self-help alone is rarely sufficient for moderate to severe cases. Specialty consultation with a clinician trained in ERP or ACT is recommended when symptoms significantly interfere with daily functioning, relationships, or safety.
NIMH recommends specialty consultation with a clinician trained in ERP or ACT for OCD, particularly when symptoms interfere significantly with daily functioning, relationships, or safety [NIMH, 2023]. The International OCD Foundation maintains a directory of trained providers [International OCD Foundation, 2023]. If you or someone you know is experiencing suicidal thoughts—which are more common in OCD than many clinicians recognize [Angelakis et al., 2015]—contact the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline in the U.S. or the equivalent crisis service in your country.
A Final Word: From Fighting the Mind to Living the Life
Perhaps the most profound gift ACT brings to OCD treatment is a shift in the goal itself. Traditional models frame recovery as "getting rid of" obsessions and compulsions. ACT frames recovery as reclaiming a life large enough to include difficult inner experiences without being ruled by them. Obsessions may still arrive—unbidden, absurd, terrifying. But the person is no longer their content, no longer their servant. They are the one who watches, chooses, and moves toward what matters, weather and all.
For many people who have felt trapped in ERP that felt punitive or impossible, and for many who have felt lost in mindfulness practices that never quite touched their compulsions, the integration of ACT and ERP offers a genuinely third path—one that is both rigorous and humane, both evidence-based and deeply human.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ACT as effective as ERP for OCD?
Research suggests ACT produces outcomes comparable to established behavioral treatments for OCD, with some trials showing similar symptom reduction to ERP or progressive relaxation [Twohig et al., 2010]. However, most experts recommend integrating ACT with ERP rather than using it alone, especially for moderate to severe OCD. The combination often improves acceptability, reduces dropout, and preserves the exposure-based mechanisms that drive recovery.
Can ACT be used for Pure O and scrupulosity?
Yes—ACT is especially well-suited for purely obsessional and scrupulosity subtypes where compulsions are largely mental. Because ACT emphasizes changing the relationship with intrusive thoughts rather than eliminating them, it offers powerful tools like defusion and acceptance for internal experiences that traditional external exposures cannot target as easily. Studies specifically support ACT for scrupulosity [Twohig et al., 2015].
How is cognitive defusion different from a compulsion?
Cognitive defusion aims to change your relationship with a thought while allowing it to remain, whereas compulsions aim to eliminate, neutralize, or escape the thought. Defusion says, "This is a mental event I can notice," while compulsions say, "I must make this feeling go away." When defusion is used to dismiss or minimize contact with feared material, it has crossed the line into avoidance.
How long does ACT-enhanced ERP take to work?
A typical protocol runs 12 to 20 sessions, with many clients noticing meaningful shifts in psychological flexibility and OCD interference within 8 to 10 sessions. Full response and consolidation of gains often continue for months after formal therapy ends, especially as clients practice committed action in daily life. Severity, comorbidity, and engagement all influence pace.
Can I do ACT for OCD on my own?
Self-help ACT practices—defusion, values clarification, willingness exercises—can support recovery, especially for mild symptoms. However, moderate to severe OCD typically requires a trained clinician who can design exposures, prevent subtle compulsions, and hold the therapeutic frame. Self-guided work without response prevention often becomes mindfulness practice rather than OCD treatment.
Does ACT work with SSRIs for OCD?
Yes. SSRIs remain first-line pharmacotherapy for OCD and combine well with both ERP and ACT. ACT can also help clients tolerate uncertainty about medication effects—such as when an SSRI is "working enough"—without turning that uncertainty into another obsessional loop or reassurance-seeking pattern.
What if my OCD gets worse when I try acceptance?
Temporary increases in distress are common and often signal that you are genuinely contacting feared material rather than avoiding it. This is consistent with inhibitory learning models, which emphasize that new learning depends on real engagement, not comfort. Sustained worsening, however, warrants clinical support to ensure acceptance is not being applied without adequate structure, values framing, or response prevention.
References
American Psychiatric Association (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed., Text Revision (DSM-5-TR). https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/dsm
American Psychiatric Association (2023). Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/clinical-practice-guidelines
Angelakis, I., Gooding, P., Tarrier, N., & Panagioti, M. (2015). Suicidality in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25875222/
Armstrong, A. B., Morrison, K. L., & Twohig, M. P. (2013). A preliminary investigation of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for adolescent obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32759122/
Bluett, E. J., Homan, K. J., Morrison, K. L., Levin, M. E., & Twohig, M. P. (2014). Acceptance and commitment therapy for anxiety and OCD spectrum disorders: An empirical review. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24856006/
Child Mind Institute (2023). Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Children. https://childmind.org/topics/obsessive-compulsive-disorder/
Craske, M. G., Treanor, M., Conway, C. C., Zbozinek, T., & Vervliet, B. (2014). Maximizing exposure therapy: An inhibitory learning approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24864005/
Gloster, A. T., Walder, N., Levin, M. E., Twohig, M. P., & Karekla, M. (2020). The empirical status of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144720301939
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The Process and Practice of Mindful Change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Acceptance-and-Commitment-Therapy/Hayes-Strosahl-Wilson/9781609189624
International OCD Foundation (2023). About OCD and Treatment Options. https://iocdf.org/about-ocd/
National Alliance on Mental Illness (2023). Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. https://www.nami.org/About-Mental-Illness/Mental-Health-Conditions/Obsessive-compulsive-Disorder
National Institute of Mental Health (2023). Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Statistics. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/obsessive-compulsive-disorder-ocd
Ong, C. W., Clyde, J. W., Bluett, E. J., Levin, M. E., & Twohig, M. P. (2016). Dropout rates in exposure with response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: What do the data really say? Journal of Anxiety Disorders. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27837671/
Öst, L. G., Havnen, A., Hansen, B., & Kvale, G. (2015). Cognitive behavioral treatments of obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published 1993–2014. Clinical Psychology Review. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26117062/
Radomsky, A. S., Alcolado, G. M., Abramowitz, J. S., et al. (2014). Part 1—You can run but you can't hide: Intrusive thoughts on six continents. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2211364913000936
Twohig, M. P., Hayes, S. C., Plumb, J. C., et al. (2010). A randomized clinical trial of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy versus progressive relaxation training for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20873905/
Twohig, M. P., Abramowitz, J. S., Bluett, E. J., et al. (2015). Exposure therapy for OCD from an acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) framework. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S221136491400084X
Twohig, M. P., Abramowitz, J. S., Smith, B. M., et al. (2018). Adding acceptance and commitment therapy to exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30268381/
Twohig, M. P., & Levin, M. E. (2020). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for anxiety and OCD. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29179862/
Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8121959/
Wilson, K. G., Sandoz, E. K., Kitchens, J., & Roberts, M. (2010). The Valued Living Questionnaire: Defining and measuring valued action within a behavioral framework. The Psychological Record. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03395706
World Health Organization (2022). Mental Disorders: Key Facts. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-disorders